The following was posted by the Canadian.org in the Terrace Daily Online.
http://www.terracedaily.ca/show11132a/TANKER_TRAFFIC_AND_PIPELINE_APPROVAL_EXPOSED_BEFORE_VOTE
All the lies in the world will not make this happen.
If you love this province and it's beauty as I do then VOTE ABC (anyone but Clark)
If the Liberals form the next government I can only hope it is a Minority with Some Greens and a Few more Independents.
5/02/2013
Christy Clark, RESIGN
I am calling here for the resignation of Christy Clark.
After watching and experiencing the way the Liberals act toward the people of this province I have concluded that there is one law for the people and one law for the Liberals.
The Liberal party has been engaging in attacks on other candidates, with the sole purpose of discrediting them and demanding there resignations. Some of the misdeeds are from four to twelve years old. Who is paying for these investigations? The Liberals? The people of BC through the (former) Public Affairs Bureau. Was a data base amassed and given to the Liberals for such purposes?
These attacks are done on other candidates while approximately 12 Liberals in the past 12 years have committed offenses much worse than those the Liberals are claiming of others.
So....
Recent news articles about Ms. Clarks driving habits, widely publicized, have led me to conclude the following:
1. There appears to be no investigation into the incident of her breaking the law by running a red light. Why are the police silent? What is ICBC doing about this?
2. She endangered the life of her child and a passenger in her vehicle, as well as her own.This alone would warrant a charge of reckless endangerment, driving without due care, and disobeying a traffic control.
3. Why has she not been charged?
4 Why has she not resigned as a candidate as others have done.
Do I smell two different sets of laws?
Because I know that the government watches this blog (and others) religiously I will assume they will attempt to dig more dirt up on me. Anything said about me will not be either confirmed nor denied.
.
After watching and experiencing the way the Liberals act toward the people of this province I have concluded that there is one law for the people and one law for the Liberals.
The Liberal party has been engaging in attacks on other candidates, with the sole purpose of discrediting them and demanding there resignations. Some of the misdeeds are from four to twelve years old. Who is paying for these investigations? The Liberals? The people of BC through the (former) Public Affairs Bureau. Was a data base amassed and given to the Liberals for such purposes?
These attacks are done on other candidates while approximately 12 Liberals in the past 12 years have committed offenses much worse than those the Liberals are claiming of others.
So....
Recent news articles about Ms. Clarks driving habits, widely publicized, have led me to conclude the following:
1. There appears to be no investigation into the incident of her breaking the law by running a red light. Why are the police silent? What is ICBC doing about this?
2. She endangered the life of her child and a passenger in her vehicle, as well as her own.This alone would warrant a charge of reckless endangerment, driving without due care, and disobeying a traffic control.
3. Why has she not been charged?
4 Why has she not resigned as a candidate as others have done.
Do I smell two different sets of laws?
Because I know that the government watches this blog (and others) religiously I will assume they will attempt to dig more dirt up on me. Anything said about me will not be either confirmed nor denied.
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)